Feed on
Posts
Comments

Upon reading many of the blog posts this week relating to COVID-19, I noticed a lot of us talked about the dystopian genre or various works of literature we were reminded of. In the class Deviant Forms and Bodies with Professor Nevison, we’ve talked a lot about how different monsters reflect different cultural and societal fears. It made me wonder how the horror genre will change in the upcoming years, and I found some articles that I thought some of you might be interested in reading.

One talks about the surge in home invasion movies in 2016, fueled by xenophobia.

This one talks about how people are watching more pandemic movies in the wake of the corona virus.

This one discusses the various types of antagonists one might see in a modern horror film.

Lastly, this one talks about horror movies throughout the decades and the social fears they represented.

I think they’re all interesting reads, especially the last one, and I think they might be worth thinking about as we move forward.

Bury a Friend

When I began to see and read the posts about Covid-19, I believed, just as most of us reasoned, that this virus was not something to become panicked about, as an overwhelming amount of sickness and mass death couldn’t be the cause of a virus that was being compared to having a cold.

The beginning of spring break was when I started to consider that this virus could turn into something more serious, but I still wasn’t willing to face the truth. I gave some nonchalant dispute over lunch when I was warned that this virus could become dangerous, even becoming upset when I was told to hold off on some plans I made for the following weekend.

It might seem that I was in denial (which I was), but I think the feeling of confusion and frustration is a sign of inexperienced circumstances, as I am well aware I am not the sole person feeling disappointed from the outcome of this pandemic. Within the span of hours, we continue to receive news about the spread of Covid-19, urging us to limit groups and social distance as the number of deaths continue to rise.

Except people aren’t listening, and neither is our president, going so far to spread fake news, when even officials are not positive themselves about this virus. While we are continuing to take steps in the right direction, I am still seeing news articles of thousands continuing with their spring break plans, ignoring the pleas to social distance and quarantine.

When I first read “Inventory” by Carmen Maria Machado, I didn’t give a significant amount of thought, but last night I decided to give it another read. What I failed to realize before is that the young narrator is selfish, ignorant and naive, focusing on her wants rather than on what is happening around her. This characterization is how I would like to describe those who are disregarding the advice of the officials. This isn’t going to become better if some of us listen, and some of us don’t.

Then, there are people who are listening…a little too much. Hoarding hand sanitizer, toilet paper, wipes, not even taking into consideration others who need these supplies as well.

The day I woke up and the air had changed, I realized it had been a long time coming. She was sitting on the couch. She got up in the night and made some tea. But the cup was tipped and the puddle was cold, and I recognized the symptoms from the television and newspapers, and then the leaflets, and then the radio broadcasts, and then the hushed voices around the bonfire. Her skin was the dark purple of compounded bruises, the whites of her eyes shot through with red, and blood leaking from the misty beds of her fingernails. There was no time to mourn. I checked my own face in the mirror, and my eyes were still clear. I consulted my emergency list and its supplies. I took my bag and tent and I got into the dinghy and I rowed to the island, to this island, where I have been stashing food since I got to the cottage.

While the limitations and constraints of different countries and states might seem like something out of the fantastic, I more see it as a precaution to protect the virus from spreading. I want to focus more on what our media has to offer towards this pandemic, thus being the fantastic element in this “fiction.” With multiple sources manipulating what we understand about this virus, we pursue these fallacies, which has been the ultimate cause of ignorance, thus being the origin of this pandemic.

“All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.”

We’ve all heard of cabin fever. Well, welcome to self-quarantine during the Coronavirus, with social distancing and young folks who are being advised to stay far away from the Boomers.
So far my room is clean; we created an at-home office for me in the old guest room; the dishwasher broke; and we had to buy organic toilet-paper because Costco was sold out of, well, everything. You could try Amazon but they are out of everything, too. As the whole world is being asked to stay home during the coronavirus outbreak, many are learning first-hand the definition of feeling distraught because of prolonged confinement, which is just becoming more and more a fancy way to say stir-crazy.

It’s not all bad, except the harmony of my household has been severely affected. You see, I’m a senior in college and finding out that you’re going to be homeschooled until April isn’t exactly my cup of tea. Mainly because I’m an extrovert who is trapped living with three introverts. I’ve never been more homesick before, and I’m at home now. It’s strange to find out who you are when you’re in quarantine. Three of the four people in this household have been sent home, and man, have we butted heads. You find out people’s worst habits, and we all want to get out but have nowhere to go. I feel like I’m living in a modern-day The Shining (without the killing…). The most recent development of isolation with family was last night when there was a fight between two brothers on our front lawn, and the police came and had to talk to them. When you have a lot of pent up anger and emotions towards someone, being trapped with them may sound like a good idea, but in reality, I’d prefer the police not to show up in my driveway.

Now is this new version of isolation Fantastic? I think the Fantastic part about this all is how this pandemic has the human race on their toes. Only old people are dying; Italy is on lockdown; and neighbors are serenading each other from balconies. And the big one: we are all very unsure when this will end. Or maybe the Fantastic part of it all is watching nature take back her land. Fish and swans return to Venice’s canals as Italy’s lockdown leaves the water uncannily pristine. Some say there is already a difference in air quality over there. Spring is still blooming on schedule, and it’s getting warmer again.

I wonder if this is how we save the planet.

Even though I live in the Blue Ridge mountains, I still have school work and forget to go outside most days. If I’m going to go crazy, I might as well follow suit and stay in my pj’s all day. The only escape is my dreams, which are more like nightmares of missing class, no wifi, and dying.

We are being told that this is the new normal for a while, that’s the only way we can rationalize our anxiety about being restricted to one location with people who may be your family but aren’t really your apocalypse crew of choice.

I saw a post today warning people against reading Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s 1892 classic “The Yellow Wallpaper.” This confused me, as I believe the only people ever to be in danger of reading that story are high school juniors, and I’m pretty sure all of them are busy finding new and better ways to avoid their online schoolwork, like the kids in Wuhan who flooded their homework app with so many 1 star reviews it was deleted, which feels like a particularly funny detail from a Steven Millhauser speculative history. Still, I’ve been thinking a lot about “The Yellow Wallpaper.” It wasn’t a story I enjoyed reading while it was going on, but the ending’s always stuck with me, the image of our protagonist crawling on the floor attempting to free herself from behind the wall. At the time, I thought it was gendered. After conferring with other women and girls, I’ve learned it’s just me.

In trying to think of similar works about the theme of isolation, nothing particularly fantastic came to mind. I know Blindness is flying off the shelves (digitally, of course, to prevent contamination), but what came to my mind were more books such as Catcher in the Rye, Hamlet (yes I know it’s a play), and The Bell Jar (my personal favorite). I thought of Carmen Maria Machado’s “Inventory,” of course, but also the more grounded “The Resident” and “Difficult at Parties.” If we keep in mind that all fiction is fantastic, since none of it is real (except maybe The Bell Jar, but that isn’t the point) then I’ve come up with a fun fantasy list, but unfortunately all of my selections are rooted firmly in reality, but then again, how is reality any less fantastic? Is it not fantastic that I was able to have a video phone call today, like on The Jetsons? I keep imagining time traveling to 1892 and explaining that my sister lives over 350 miles away from me but that I still have the opportunity to talk to her every day. I bet they’d think it’s even more fantastic that I don’t take that opportunity every chance I get.

I think what is or isn’t fantastic can change for every person every day. When I first started at Sweet Briar, I was totally uncomfortable with anything having to do with what the Bible would consider magic, but then just today (I think– time doesn’t have a solid grip on me right now) I was explaining to someone how my tarot cards tried to tell me weeks ago that we would be moving to online classes, and I’m sure other people have similar stories. The idea of what is or isn’t fantasy varies too much from culture to culture and person to person for it to be a solid concept, and I’m excited to see what stops being fantasy for me in the future.

As I was reading OHYOS I kept trying to pin down the fantastic elements. But there were so so many and none of them were fantastic enough to be fantastic in my mind. No matter what I was reading (a man followed by butterflies, people paying to view ice, a girl just floating up and disappearing, a man just going crazy and speaking Latin) my brain never registered it as out of the ordinary. I was very cognizant that I was reading a book that was fantastic (it was for this class after all) yet I was explaining away the extraordinary. It took me a while to realize I was reading the novel through COVID-19 glasses. This whole experience has been almost otherworldly and, I hate to say it, so dystopian that it’s flipped my understanding of what is possible/believable. Especially with the case of the insomnia sickness in the first half, I wasn’t focused on the implausibility of people being able to live without sleep and instead just losing memory, but I instead latched onto the process of them trying to contain and manage the contagious sickness. With anything that was crazier than that, my brain just went “Sure, why not.” The mass hysteria of the real world –the misinformation, the shopping craze, the widespread panic –made  me read all unnatural events as moments of panic or miscommunication. This story is told as a family and town history by a non-biased author, but I realized I was reading it as a crazy tabloid news article: kinda getting the gist but exploding with incorrect facts and exaggerations. See any connections to media today?

So, long story short, this pandemic has bent how I understand the world around me. Things that seemed impossible and so far out of reach have become part of my daily life now. I can’t decide if I want it to stay like this or if I want to move on as quickly as possible.

On a completely separate note: one particular irony of OHYOS had me so uncomfy. The beginning two chapters Ursula is so concerned about giving birth to incest children with pig tails.  Then she goes on to lead the most incesty family I have ever read about. I am really curious about the purpose of/thoughts behind including such an *ahem* interwoven family with all of the same gosh dang names. If we were meeting tomorrow, that’s something I’d definitely ask about.

The outbreak of Covid-19 brings the fantastic into the non-fiction. In this class, we discuss the fantastic and scary aspects of stories, not our current state. According to the CDC, the number of cases was 4,226 on March 16th for the United States. Today, March 18th, the number is 9,345. World wide the virus has infected 219,228. If this was from a story read in class, it would be seen as fantastic because of the numbers and how infectious it is. In our class discussion on “Smack,” we discussed the number of jellyfish that would have to be stranded on a beach before that number became fantastic; this virus is, in a way, an extension of that conversation, just in our world and not on the page. Life as we know it has stopped. Church services have been canceled, schools closed, and families separated and isolated. Human lives have become devalued in a way.

Another aspect that leans towards the fantastic is that everyone is saying, “It only kills the elderly and people with underlying health issues,” as if those people don’t matter and that outcome is, therefore, acceptable. We have discussed in class how it seems impossible to us that the people in the society would accept the fantastic as if it wasn’t odd. The idea that some people will die and others don’t seem to care reminded me of Farquaad in Shrek. “Some of you may die, but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to take.” Others go out into the world carrying this virus with the mentality that the majority who catch it will live; this view is inconsiderate, and it’s unfortunate that it is widely accepted. It is not words of comfort as it dehumanizes and devalues anyone with even a minor health issue.

Covid-19 seems pulled from a story and thrown onto our everyday lives. This is a pandemic taken straight from a novel.

The Fantastic in OHYOS

quote-my-most-important-problem-was-destroying-the-lines-of-demarcation-that-separate-what-gabriel-garcia-marquez-37-79-68Garcia Marquez weaves countless varieties of the fantastic into the first forty pages of his novel. Starting from the opening line, we are given both future and past at the same time. “Many years later,” we are told, “as he faced the firing squad, Colonel Aureliano Buendia was to remember that distant afternoon when his father took him to discover ice.”  Such an intriguing and captivating line as well as a hint that Garcia Marquez will often change from past, present, and the future as the story unfolds.

The obsession of Jose Arcadio Buendia with the sciences transforms him from a youthful patriarch of the village into a madman. As is told on page nine, “…pulled away by the fever of the magnets, the astronomical calculations, the dreams of transmutation, and the urge to discover the wonders of the world…from a clean and active man…changed into a man lazy in appearance, careless in dress, with a wild beard.” It’s such a drastic, unbelievable change in both appearance and nature that the townspeople think he is under a spell.

The clairvoyance of Aureliano described on page fifteen is another example of the fantastic that adds mystery to the story. As Aureliano says from the kitchen, “It’s going to spill.’ The pot was firmly placed in the center of the table, but just as soon as the child made his announcement, it began an unmistakable movement toward the edge, as if impelled by some inner dynamism, and it fell and broke on the floor.” Did he really predict the future or was it a coincidence? We have no reason to believe it’s not true.

Even inventions can seem fantastic, as Jose Arcadio Buendia thinks when he first sees the block of ice. Prior to the gypsies bringing it, no one in Macondo had ever seen such a thing. It’s not surprising, then, that solid water would have such an impact on Buendia, especially since he believes it is the answer to his dream about a city with mirrors.

Mutations add another ingredient to Marquez’s Buendia family. Ursula’s aunt, who married Buendia’s uncle, gave birth to a son with a pig’s tail. The family viewed this as a curse because of the cousin relationship between the two, and Ursula is constantly afraid that she herself will bear a child with the same deformation because she and her husband are cousins. Now, did the son really have a pig’s tail or was it simply an unknown medical illness? Common sense tells us that it wasn’t, but we have no solid evidence to prove otherwise.

On page twenty-two, the ghost of Prudencio Aguilar haunts the house of Buendia and Ursula until both decide to leave so Aguilar could have peace. Was there really an apparition or was it simply guilt and a heavy conscience that made them leave the town?

This last example may not seem fantastic, but it’s almost unbelievable that Ursula would be the one to find the route that Buendia had long searched for but could not find. She’s the one who brings their people to Macondo and essentially puts the town on the map as a valuable resource. She hadn’t even been looking for it, but searching for her son. So a mother’s love is what opens the gates of Macondo.

I may still pause and think, “Did that really happen?”, but this class has drilled into me to simply accept the fantastic and enjoy the story.

I read a post on social media that said: “Sometimes I feel like this year is being written by a four-year-old, a lot of people got sick so they bought a lot of toilet paper and stayed home.” This unfathomable idea, or what was supposed to be incomprehensible, of COVID-19, has set people out on a frenzy buying out the paper goods aisle of grocery stores and self-quarantining themselves. Countries have shut down, national emergencies have been called, universities and colleges are deserted, friends and families are kept at a distant, and the old and sick are targeted.

Similar to what we read in Steven Millhauser’s “Dangerous Laughter,” we have this element of the fantastic, mass terror. And though the idea of terror is very much realistic, the amplified emotion is what one might consider fantastic.

This idea we believed to be impossible, and therefore a facet of the fantastic, has now hit the little planet we call “earth.” After taking such massive hits as fires in Australia and the Amazon, the possibility for a third world war, and a group of terrorists have called themselves “ISIS,” we seem headed for an apocalypse.

We were asked if the fantastic designation can be elastic or mutable, and the answer happens to depend on the story. This current story, which we might dare to call “The Corona Virus,” is one with a malleable ending not yet written. The fantastic, I believe, can be more elastic rather than mutable with the ability to stretch to the farthest corners of the human mind and time. At this moment in time, this pandemic is nothing short of a young adult novel: the wide-spread panic, the social distancing, the thousands of deaths, and the heightened emotions that we have no timeline or scale for.

For a moment, take yourself out of reality. Pretend that what is happening is on a television screen or the pages of a novel. It seems far-fetched, almost impossible to imagine as reality. It might even seem like a tired concept. After all, how many movies are based around a mysterious pandemic sweeping the nation? We’ve even read something involving a mysterious disease, Carmen Maria Machado’s “Inventory.” There is no shortage of plagues or diseases in the human imagination, but it seems like such things aren’t often framed in the present.

There has also been no shortage of plagues in humanity’s past. Two that stand out are the Black Death and the AIDs crisis. Memorable as they are, they are often placed far in the past. But the bubonic plague isn’t something of the Middle Ages- at least not entirely. There are still cases of it today. A less understandable sort of push against the idea of a modern outbreak is what has happened in relation to HIV and AIDs. Maybe it’s just the fault of my education, but for most of my career as a student there has been a perception of the AIDs crisis as far away, but that couldn’t be further from the truth. Almost everyone has a family member that lived through the AIDs crisis. Many older LGBTQ people had social circles affected by the AIDs crisis. Despite this, there is almost an anachronism to the way we treat it, pushing it as far away as we can.

It makes me wonder about the nature of our relationship to disease that we push ourselves as far away from pandemics as we can. A lot of media we have depicting pandemics is apocalyptic in nature, a glimpse into some alternate future where we are subject to a disease we can’t imagine being reality. Is it fear, no matter whether it is rational or not, driving us to de-realize situations such as this? That could be a reason, I suppose. After all, one of the horsemen of the apocalypse is Pestilence. But in biblical terms, plagues are not always such a bad thing; a plague freed the Jews from the hands of the Pharaoh in Egypt. While there is really no single answer to why our relationship with disease is so strange, it is something interesting to sit with and think about.

The past few weeks have been unforgettable as a sickness that frightens many has rapidly spread across the United States. It is unlike anything I have seen in my lifetime. So much so, as a matter of fact, that it almost doesn’t seem real. The fantastic aspect of this begins with the public panic part of it. Panic buying has been ever-present in the past few weeks and has clearly been a source of hardship for some, as store shelves of necessities are empty. This in itself seems like something straight out of a book. Several stories come to mind for me when I consider a plague of sorts. Daniel Defoe’s Journal of a Plague year strikes a resemblance, though it isn’t necessarily a fictional account.

Another book I think of when I see the widespread panic, is The Stand, by Stephen King. While COVID-19 is in it’s earlier stages and probably won’t cause such unrealistic destruction as demonstrated in King’s book, it still reminds me of the panic. The fantastic component of this includes a sort of apocalyptic or dystopian thriller feeling, as we don’t know what may be included in the rest of the virus’ days. Death rates will continue to climb, though in a hopefully realistic manner.

The common clause overall is the ground-breaking misery and fear that could consume the people and cause destruction.

Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s One Hundred Years of Solitude, there are many different aspects of religion and cultures being introduced throughout the story.  It is starting with the older generation, in which they hope that the younger generations will continue the religion and culture in their own lives.  The religion and culture was seen in all aspects of what happens in everyone’s everyday life.    

 The new house, white, like a dove, was inaugurated with a dance. (59)

The religion and culture of someone you marry, may be hard to adjust to if it is not something you are culturally used too.  Which in this case, it will take the people involved to adjust to their new lives, which may take them some time and they may not like everything at first.  This process of joining forces will have to allow both parties to have to keep an open mind and take the time to adjust and not just rashly end things because they don’t like things right away. 

The Marriage was on the point of breaking up after two months because Aureliano Segundo, in an attempt to placate Petra Cotes, had a picture taken of her dressed as the Queen of Madagascar. (203)

The younger generation is usually started at a young age so that is how they live their life.  Their parents want them to live a life knowing that they will always have God, who is on their side and they can rely upon to put them in the right place.  Marquez is writing in One Hundred Years of Solitude that most of that generation is baptized and put in a certain school when they are of age so that they are able to learn everything that they must know and so that they can become closer with the religion and become more wise in what they do in life.  

Meme, his sister, dividing her time between Fernanda’s rigidity and Amaranta’s bitterness, at almost the same moment reached the age set for her to be sent to the nuns’ school. (245)

One Hundred Years of Solitude is a very exaggerated story.  There are things that Marquez wrote that wouldn’t actually happen in real life. For example, they wouldn’t take kitchen knives because they symbolize that they are going to do something, it is seen as a common kitchen utensil.  Also the length of the continuous days that it rained.  In the real world that is not something that would happen, it would only rain for a few days and then stop.

    

 

In my history classes, people always joked about the fact that we were overdue for a plague, likely thinking it wouldn’t happen. Now here we are, cancelling large-scale events, closing down schools for the rest of the year, hoarding toilet paper, and locking ourselves away while preparing for the worst. Even returning to Sweet Briar to get my things felt strange; campus was more deserted than I’d ever seen it, and having to stop at the guard tower with its bright orange cones in the middle of the day felt almost ominous. I don’t think this is something any of us would have imagined even a month ago.  For many of us, our mostly safe and normal world is beginning to feel like something out of a dystopian or apocalyptic novel.

There is an app that I’m sure many people have played — or at least heard of — called Plague Inc.  The goal of the game is to start a plague that will wipe out the global population. Nations begin closing their borders, and the easiest way to win is to start in China. Knowing things like this and hearing the term “pandemic” cause people to panic and start behaving irrationally, sometimes forgetting their compassion and humanity in the process. This is similar to how characters behave in zombie movies — turning against each other while believing it is best for their self-preservation.

How quickly things have escalated just over the past few days also shows just how quickly something can change from an element of the fantastic to a reality. It reminds me of conversations we’ve had in class about scale — when does something that might be a bit strange or out of the ordinary become the fantastic? We can also look at dystopian novels from half a century ago. Many aspects of the then-unimaginable technology have been incorporated into devices we now use daily. This shows how closely many aspects of the fantastic are rooted in reality; just because something is fantastic right now doesn’t mean it can’t become the new normal in the future.

Receiving emails all stating the same thing, hearing the news all reciting the same scripts, it brings to mind a few familiarities. Naturally, the first thing that came to my mind was the movie Contagion released in 2011. The idea of a pandemic sweeping the planet and taking out certain people. But it also reminds me of a bunch of other books too: The Maze Runner series, The Darkest Minds series, and many other young adult fiction novels. Something happens in the world, certain people are infected, and the world changes because of it. In short, all of this fits under the category of dystopia.

The definition of dystopia is, “a society characterized by human misery, as squalor, oppression, disease, and overcrowding.” This is practically what we are dealing with right now. A “disease” has taken over European countries and has now spread to the United States. We are all trapped in a dystopian world overrun by disease leaving certain people worse off than others. While some may consider it post-apocalyptic, we have not hit the “post” part yet. For this to be considered post-apocalyptic, this pandemic has to be long gone and over with. Once that happens, we can see how people cope and live with their new lives after the pandemic.

Since we are still in the peak of this disease, it can not be considered post-apocalyptic because we cant see how people live after the pandemic. This can still be considered dystopian because it can be perceived as driven by human misery and that human misery is driven by this disease.

This pandemic is undoubtedly fantastic. It makes me think of The Memory Police. In comparison, the current situation with the coronavirus (COVID-19) is temporary (hopefully), whereas in the novel, they were permanent, and we retain our memories of the things we have lost. Our freedom has been limited. We must practice social distancing and for those that have visited high-risk areas, self-isolation.  Travel restrictions and school closings have become both mandatory and necessary. The disappearance of goods such as toilet paper, hand sanitizer, and soap are a reality.

There is pain associated with the losses, perhaps because we do have our memories possibly because it is so new to live life with these restrictions.

There is fear in our present circumstances. Fear of sickness and death. Fear that our government is not fully disclosing information or that this is a ploy to destroy democracy. Fear of the unknown and fear that this will become a way of life that becomes the new norm.

Some will not comply with what the government mandates and suggest because they see this as an opportunity. Cheap flights and other means of travel compel some to live life to the fullest regardless of whom they may hurt. Some intend to make a profit by hoarding and reselling items that are in high demand, like toilet paper.

The definition of fantastic is “so extreme as to challenge belief; odd and remarkable; bizarre.” (merriam-webster.com) It is much fantastic in our world as the pandemic that looms over humankind. To what degree, then, might we consider the fantastic an elastic or mutable designation? Very much in every degree! We can go from 500 cats to 5000 in the blink of an eye! After all, we are all just drops of water with limited control in this bucket we call our universe.

 

 

Works Cited

“Fantastic.” Merriam-Webster, Merriam-Webster, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fantastic.

 

P.S. I told my daughter on Thursday that this was straight outta JGB’s class!

81nPmkrmrZLIn my email this morning, I asked you to think a bit about the current circumstances we face — the pandemic created by the novel coronavirus, the social isolation being imposed on our society and throughout much of the world, and the myriad ways in which our lives have been abruptly interrupted and altered — and its relation to the topic of this class: the varieties of the fantastic as they appear in works of fiction. The website LitHub, which aggregates literature articles from other websites and also produces content of its own, has gathered together various articles about the coronavirus. You can find that page here.

For example, this page links to this:

Le Monde is reporting that sales of Albert Camus’s 1947 classic, The Plague, have sky-rocketed in Italy, which continues to be the European nation most severely affected by the coronavirus outbreak: according to reported sale numbers in La Repubblica, the book jumped in ranking from 71st to 3rd at online sales portal IBN.it. Jose Saramago’s Blindness (which is about an epidemic of… blindness) is also flying off the shelves.

The plague novel most referenced in this part of the world (by which I mean the literary nether-corridors of America, aka literary twitter) is Ling Ma’s Severance, which tells the story of world-wide pandemic originating in China. According to Book Marks data, readers searched for Severance 50 percent more this week than last… (Maybe the only good thing about quarantine is the opportunity to catch up on reading?)

(Via Le Monde)

There is also a link to a translation of excerpts from writer Deng Anqing’s daily chronicles from a rural Chinese village and links to articles about the effect of the virus on bookstores and the broader literary community. Additional articles will no doubt continue to appear.

One Hundred Years of Solitude is very fast-paced because it covers a century of the Buendía family, and the movement in time distorts the line between fantasy and memory since years sometimes pass by without mention or notice from the narrator. The story opens by informing the reader that they will be going back in time to hear the story. “Many years later as he faced the firing squad, Colonel Aureliano Buendía was to remember that distant afternoon when his father took him to discover ice.” (pg. 1) The patriarch of the family, José Arcadio Buendía, appears to have some mental instability (OCD?) in his obsessions with technology and his alienating himself from others. Another example of his mental state was when he could not correctly build his time machine. “Ten men were needed to get him down, fourteen to tie him up, twenty to drag him to the chestnut tree in the courtyard, where they left him tied up, barking in the strange language and giving off a green froth at the mouth.” (pgs.85-86) There is irony in that, although he is maniacal, José Arcadio Buendía is a wise man who has been a pillar to the community and essential in the building of the town.

There are many fantastic elements in the story. For example, the utopic town of Macondo that is oblivious of the world around them, the fact that the town has no cemetery because no one has died, that most everyone has insomnia and has forgotten the names of everything including simple items like tables and chairs and believing that Melquíades was immortal and that he knew the “formula of his resurrection.” (pg.79) Also fantastic is that in Macondo, “The world was so recent that many things lacked names…”, giving the story an Adam and Eve feeling; however, things like magnets and firing squads have names, which further complicates the timeline and pacing of the story.

Many years later as he faced the firing squad, Colonel Aureliano Buendia was to remember that distant afternoon when his father took him to discover ice. (Garcia Marquez 1)

After finishing the first chapter of One Hundred Years of Solitude, I immediately returned to the story’s opening line; I had always known that it was a famous one, but I never knew why. With the context of the full chapter, it is easy to see why this opening line is fantastical, but until then, it keeps you guessing. We are given hints of the fantastic not long after this line—the narrator states, “The world was so recent that many things lacked names,” and yet, in the opening line, we have a reference to a firing squad—either Colonel Aureliano Buendia’s incident took place many, many, many, many years after the discovery of ice or the timeline of this world is slightly different from our own. From there, we see the gypsies and their strange inventions, Jose Arcadio Buendia and his newfound passion for alchemy, Jose Arcadio and his strange sixth sense, and, finally, the discovery of ice. This moment could possibly be viewed as non-fantastic; Macondo is an isolated village with almost no knowledge of the rest of the world, so it makes sense that Jose Arcadio Buendia would view ice as something otherworldly. However, because we have seen other hints of the fantastic in this story so far, it gives this moment a fantastical feel as well.

ice

ea8690d2e27c9e329427509bebfadc8b-RobotReadingMachinesLikeMe_tstmp_1583440640-1200-0-70-8

Here’s an interesting snippet from Washington Post Book Editor Ron Charles’s email newsletter:

The next audiobook you hear might sound like the voice of an actor you recognize but the narrator could actually be a robot. A British company called DeepZen has developed “emotive voice technology” that uses artificial intelligence to replicate particular human voices for audiobook productions. (“Alexa, do you feel threatened?”) DeepZen claims it can reduce traditional audiobook production from 60 days to seven, while creating a finished product that is “virtually indistinguishable from traditionally narrated audio.” (Listen to a digitally replicated voice narrate Franz Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis.”) The process begins by “mapping” samples of an actor’s voice. Then a computer uses that voice to “read” a book. Finally, human editors tweak the recording’s inflections as needed. Luddites may think this sounds like the textile workers being replaced by automatic looms, but DeepZen co-founder Kerem Sozugecer tells me that his company’s voice technology will provide a new source of income for narrators. DeepZen pays actors to sample their voices and then pays additional licensing fees every time their “voice map” is used to create a new audiobook. A narrator who now records, say, 10 books a year could in this brave new world be paid for voicing hundreds of books a year —without doing any actual work at all. Resistance, I hear, is futile. DeepZen has just released its first selection of AI-narrated books. Appropriately enough, the list includes Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein.”

 

 

Terms of Endearment

Screen Shot 2020-03-05 at 12.56.27 PM“Salt Slow” is a heart wrenching account from the woman narrator who recounts the love she has for her partner, which she depicts as an intense love that fades between them as time goes on.

Fall in love with someone who makes you ache, her mother had always told her.

Which as the reader can infer, the woman did love this man with a passion that made her ache, afraid that he might leave her. It wasn’t until much later in their relationship that her magnitude of intense love changed to become a more stable feeling.

This is a common theme found within most of the short stories I’ve read in Salt Slow; the woman’s self worth is dependent upon a man. Whether this self worth is found within the intimate relationship of a romantic partnership, as read about in “Granite,” the self destruction of being, as read about in “Smack,” or the healing and redemption of personhood, as read about in “Cassandra After.”

In the wake of this changing love felt between these two characters in “Salt Slow,” both are in the midst of surviving a global flood, while the woman is pregnant for the second time. The reader learns about the hardship experienced between both the woman and her partner, as she reflects on the loss of her first child. She shares the conflicting feelings of guilt and of brief excitement, and then utter despair when her partner exhibits disappointment in the news of her pregnancy. In fact, the reader receives little emotion of how the woman feels during this time of her life, but rather changes the narrative to how he feels about the situation, thus changing her attitude to match his, which in the end, ends up in the loss of her child.

In telling him, she had grasped at his arms and apologised and he had said very little, only releasing himself from her grip with an absent wriggle and asking, it seemed a long time later, what it was she wanted to do. That night, she had slept in strange hot fits on his futon and woken in the red-eye of the morning to find herself alone, realising after several bleary moments that he had left the room and closed the door behind him. She had lain where she was a long time that morning, tracing idle lines across her stomach and ribs and listening to him moving about in separate parts of the flat – boiling the kettle twice and leaving it, testing the smoke alarm, talking dully on the phone.

Ultimately, of course, she had only been pregnant a grand total of three months and seven days, that first time around. Even so, the memory of that morning had persisted well beyond the bleeding. A very slender sort of betrayal, the deliberate absence from a room.

The ache felt in this love could be considered the loss of the child, but I argue that it is the emotional trauma caused from the disappointment of her partner, and the occuring response of dissatisfaction in her current pregnancy.

The reader doesn’t get an explanation as to why he is against her pregnancies, which contributes to the ultimate loss of love, but it is the failure to meet expectations within the relationship that drives a divide between the two. Thus, it is the toxic socital gender norms and the expectations of those norms (pleasing the man, providing for family, etc.) that make these two strangers in the end.

In Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings” elements of the Fantastic exist right away. With the homely details of Pelayo and Elisenda’s life with Fantastic elements such as an “angel” being sent to heal a sick child. From the beginning of the story, Garcia Marquez’s style comes through in his unusual wordplay such as his description of the relentless rain

The worls had been sad since Tuesday

There is a mingling of the Fantastic and ordinary throughout the story, including the swarm of scrabs that invade Pelayo and Elisenda’s home and the muddy sand of the beach that in the rainy grayness looks “like powdered light”. Knowing about what kind of environment is being presented to the reader, it comes naturally to us when the old winged man appears, a living myth, someone who is nevertheless covered in lice and dressed in rags.  This old man arrives in the small town looking very sick and can hardly compose a sentence when he spoke.

[He had] huge buzzard wings, dirty and half-plucked, [that] were forever entangled in the mud.

He is thought to be an angel sent to help the poor sick child, but is trapped when the child woke up without a fever and a desire to eat. The old man is subject to being kidnaped and kept in a chicken coop until finally, he regains enough strength to fly away and rid himself of the toxic reticule.

angelAs the story began, I thought the point of view of “A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings” was very important. The story begins when a supernatural weather occurrence happens and no one knows what is happening. One day, a weak old man is found lying in the mud. Everyone is curious and frightened, but they also have trouble believing that he is a real angel, based on his disheveled appearance. As far as point of view, it seems that the story is written in third person omniscient because even though it follows a specific character, there is also the exposure of other people’s thoughts and reactions, or in third person limited, since the story follows one person and they could simply be seeing the reactions of others. This is interesting because it wasn’t written in first person. Instead, the reader receives many different opinions and actions from the other characters.

As I was reading this, I became curious about the supernatural in the story. I wondered whether or not the angel was the only supernatural occurrence. However, the rains that kill all of the fish seems like it is supernatural, as well as the child being magically cured. It seems to me, that this is a visibly fantastic story on its own, with a lot of fictional components and reactions.

Something else I thought was interesting about this story was how the author depicted this angel in such a disheveled state. This, combined with the people’s curiosity and the angel’s patience, made this story very unique. I liked the detail that the angel was there to either heal or take away the sick child. I thought this added depth to the story and made it more interesting. The reactions of the people are interesting as well. Most of them are skeptical, but others are fascinated and do everything they can to pester the angel, by pulling his feathers, poking him, and other things. In the end, the angel’s patience proves to be significant, as the child is healed and the angel is soon able to fly away.

 

 

bdefe183b2988e0a9d713bf6766c9757The fantastic in “Salt Slow” is not the many sea creatures that appear dead on the surface of the water; it is the size of the sea creatures. There is not one specific element of the fantastic in this story; a few others are the “baby” born, the webbed fingers that grow as the creatures grow, and the abandoned boats/settlements. “Her feet are growing webbed, although they don’t talk about that. Sometimes at night he takes his apple knife to the delicate membranes between her toes, but they don’t talk about that, either.” “Salt slow” shows the distance between people, the couple the story follows, and the distance between their current lives and their past ones. The flooding is a reference to the biblical flood, or at least similar to it. The people left are few and far between, however, the only animals we see as readers is the mythical sized from the boat. We only hear about animals we know as dead or food. Everything in this story has changed except the couple, and even then the flashbacks show the difference in what they had before the flood and after the tide started. Their relationship went from one of passion to one not necessarily of necessity, but one of mutual understanding. “WHEN THEY HAD first fallen in love, she had kissed him with an intensity which imagined him already halfway out the door.” I think this is not only a story of the fantastic, but it is also a type of horror story. These creatures and life on the ocean is the true horror. Her body is transforming to be more sea creatures like, and the “child” she gives birth to is not human. This is a physical transformation, unlike “Metamorphosis,” that was how Gregor felt in his situation. In “Salt Slow,” the change is literal. She is becoming like the creatures below.

The detail that stuck out the most to me in my readings of “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings” was Father Gonzaga’s initial interaction with the angel.

Alien to the impertinences of the world, he only lifted his antiquarian eyes and murmured something in his dialect when Father Gonzaga went into the chicken coop and said good morning to him in Latin. The parish priest had his first suspicion of an impostor when he saw that he did not understand the language of God or know how to greet his ministers. (219.)

This moment is illustrative of the theme of the work: The angel does not conform to human standards, and therefore must be punished for it.

Throughout the story, we see the angel’s misfortune: The whole reason he ends up captured is because he failed in his mission to collect Pelayo and Elisenda’s sickly newborn. He is then dragged through the mud, stuffed in a chicken coop, and kept there for literal years. The thought of this literal divine creature being treated in such a way is, I imagine, abhorrent to most readers. What I also find interesting is the detail that Pelayo “did not have the heart to club him to death” (118) and yet the story opens with Pelayo killing crabs. Marquez sets these creatures as foils against one another: Crabs may be killed right away, but they didn’t undergo near the trials that the angel did.

I found it interesting that with the story’s viewpoint, being mainly a conglomerate of the townspeople with individuals occasionally popping out to take control, the angel is rarely described in positive terms. “Angel” is typically a positive term in its own regard, but the angel in this described even in the title as “very old,” and at the end Elisenda reflects on him being “an annoyance in her life.” (225). Flipping the script on the usual story of encounter with the divine, Garcia Marquez creates a more interesting, more resonant tale of human treatment of creatures (and people!) we consider different from ourselves.

I think “A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings” brings up some very interesting points and questions about human  behavior — in particular, our inclination to trap all that is different and perhaps all that is beautiful. Throughout the story, the characters are incredibly fascinated by all that is out of the ordinary, but instead of admiring those differences, they are turned into something akin to sideshow horrors. In the case of the Angel, he is trapped with no choice of how he is seen or treated. I think this story provides an interesting commentary, perhaps unintentional, about how humans approach the unknown and unfamiliar.

I think it also provides a little insight into the behavior of religious people. One of the most interesting things about this story is how even though the people believe the man to be an angel, they still choose to trap him and use him for their own benefit. Although they believe him to be a messenger of the highest power, they abuse him just because he is weak and vulnerable. There is something– in my experience– so Catholic about claiming some part of God as your own, bending a part of the religion to fit exactly what you want it to be, ignoring every miracle, sign, and shred of evidence and focusing on your own idea of what your angel should be and look like. The story shows (of course to me) how malleable religion and beliefs can be.

God, “Salt Slow” was a gut-wrenching read. There was something about it that felt like a confession, as if it were a piece that I should be looking away from. A part of “Salt Slow” that resonated so massively was this love between the man and woman that seemed to be eroding, which as the piece moves on it implies had already been wearing away. Behind the beautiful, horrifying imagery of over-grown birds and nets of dead sea life is a vulnerable relationship that seems to be improving and worsening at the same time. Their nights are gentle, but during the days they hardly look at each other. The image of their relationship being quite literally the ship they are on, delicately balanced at all times with the danger of throwing themselves overboard if they draw too near, is a precious idea that Armfield introduced and I am unable to let go of.

Getting the woman’s current pregnancy side by side with her miscarriage makes the degradation of their relationship and the following actions all the more painful. It clearly wasn’t the right time for it, but we see the way the man reacts as well as his mother. The blame is placed on her for what happened, without considering how she is affected. Miscarriage is an awful, paralytic thing for a lot of people. But here we get to see her second chance, the time that she does give birth. And this baby is ripped away too.

The heart is a complicated thing. By putting these characters in an apocalypse and having them serve as the only survivors that the reader sees, they are set up as a pseudo-Adam-and-Eve. Perhaps a more apt comparison would be Noah and Naamah. Reading it, I fully expected them to have the baby and raise it. To begin humanity anew, even with the more aquatic features. That hope is dashed across the deck of the boat along with the child. I suppose the story could be simplified, just say that the man was the villain and move on, but there is so much complicating that statement. There is a fragility to the way he is described, and again I draw back to their relationship as their boat. “Moving is an act of faith.” What is having a child, if not the ultimate movement?

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »